Trump hails destruction of Iranian bridge, warning ‘more to follow’

WASHINGTON - US President Donald Trump celebrated the destruction of a bridge near Tehran, Iran, on April 2, warning on social media that there was “much more to follow”.

The attack on the B1 bridge between Tehran and the nearby city of Karaj killed eight people and wounded 95, according to Fars, a semiofficial Iranian news agency.

Iran’s state broadcaster, IRIB, reported that two strikes had hit the bridge about an hour apart, the second arriving while emergency responders were assisting the wounded.

A US military official said that US forces had struck the bridge, eliminating what the official called a planned military supply route for Iran’s missile and drone forces. The official spoke on condition of anonymity to share operational details.

But Mehr, another semiofficial Iranian news agency, said the claim the span was being used as a military supply route was false. “Bridge B1 has not yet been inaugurated,” it said.

It is unclear if the bridge, in the mountains, was open to the public or if the casualties were among people on the bridge or nearby. The strike occurred on the last day of Nowruz, the Iranian new year, which is traditionally a day when Iranians celebrate by spending time outdoors.

Mr Trump’s post on Truth Social was accompanied by a video of an explosion on or near the bridge and a large plume of smoke rising into the sky.

With the US-Israeli war on Iran now in its fifth week and showing little sign of abating despite Washington’s diplomatic overtures to Tehran, Mr Trump in his social media post urged Iran’s government to “MAKE A DEAL BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE, AND THERE IS NOTHING LEFT OF WHAT STILL COULD BECOME A GREAT COUNTRY!”

The Israeli military said in a briefing to reporters on April 2 that it was not responsible, and that the bridge had been a US target. US Central Command, which oversees American military operations in the Middle East, did not reply to a request for comment.

Mr Trump has threatened to destroy all power plants and other infrastructure in Iran if its leaders did not agree to a peace deal and end their military’s de facto blockade of the Strait of Hormuz.

Some experts in the law of armed conflict say that a country’s infrastructure could be considered a legal and legitimate target if that infrastructure is used by its military or plays a role in military operations. The legality would vary on a case-by-case basis.

“Whether the bridge was a lawful military objective would depend on the facts,” said Mr Brian Finucane, a former State Department lawyer who specialised in the law of armed conflict and who now works at the International Crisis Group. “My read is that bridge was targeted not to provide any military advantage but in the hopes of coercing Tehran and generating content.” NYTIMES